Tread Lightly: Ecotourism may not be as innocent as it seems

20 03 2010

Despite our efforts to enjoy our planet’s ecosystems without having a negative impact, it’s become clear that ecotourism has the potential to be very harmful.  Although ecotourism is being advertised as being zero impact, it’s clear that the masses of people touring these ecosystems are taking their toll.  In light of this reality, it’s important that we address these problems before too much damage is caused by our seemingly innocent interest in our planet.

Ecotourism is unique in two main ways.  First, ecotourism concentrates on enjoying the natural splendor of our planet and largely avoids city centers and human accomplishments, and somewhat ironically as we will learn, it’s designed to be impact free, meaning that the visiting people do not damage or influence the environment during their visit.  Due to the massive popularity ecotourism has enjoyed over the last couple of decades and its subsequent expansion, the definition of the term “ecotourism” has evolved.  ”Ecotourism” now commonly refers to any tourism that centers itself around enjoying nature, and away from its original impact free designation.  It’s this new definition of term “ecotourism”, which will be the basis for our examination of the problem.

Many good things have come from the popularity of ecotourism.  Thanks to ecotourism, many of our planet’s environments are now well understood and in turn protected (at least in spirit) by a large portion of the world’s population.  Without this exposure, many of these places would have gone ignored or forgotten, leaving them exposed to industrial harm without any sort of politically organized opposition.  In addition, a lot of the revenue being produced by this brand of tourism is contributing to conservation efforts in host countries as they continue to recognize the benefits of their unique natural resources. Additionally, a lot of promotional material is being produced which highlights that ecotourism helps these environments by educating the public, generating funds for conservation and an increasing public interest in environmentalism.

Ironically, ecotourism is also causing harm to the ecosystems we travel to see.  During the First International Conference on Climate Change and Tourism held in Tunisia in 2003, it was noted that the various means of transportation these tourists are using to travel, are having a negative impact on the local environments.  The increased use of roads, airplanes, and ships has become a major contributor in the accumulation of greenhouse gasses, as well as noise pollution.  They also noted that while visiting these remote locations, people are consuming large amounts of water, food and other consumables.  This in turn increases the need for the importation of consumable products, as well as an increase in the need for drinking water and sewage treatment; all of which have a negative impact on these delicate environments.   The world’s coral reefs, grasslands, and rainforests are suffering from physical damage due to the increase of human traffic through these environments, which prior to the boom in ecotourism’s popularity, would have remained relatively untouched (at least by these masses of tourists).  It’s become clear that too much of a good thing, is causing ecotourism to become a foe instead of a friend of nature.

To better understand the issue at hand, it’s important to look at a specific case where ecotourism has become an issue.  Costa Rica was an early pioneer in the formation and popularization of ecotourism.    Ecotourism first arrived in Costa Rica in the 1960s and quickly grew into a multi-million dollar business, and by the mid-nineties a vast majority of visitors were arriving in Costa Rica for nature related activities.  But despite the economic growth and social awareness that the Costa Rican government has managed to provide, many of the country’s fragile ecosystems are being threatened by over-visitation.  There has been a steady decline in numbers of rainforest birds as well as the quality of Costa Rica’s rivers and inland waters.  Many of these problems stem from the fact that there is little or no enforcement of any established standards of ecotourism.  Almost any travel company can provide “ecotourism” to their clientele, however very little of this “ecotravel” actually operates in an ecologically sustainable manner.  In order to provide tourism for the masses of travelers now wanting to spend their hard earned travel dollars to see nature, impact free travel have been replaced with methods that suit higher volume business.

This damage is not limited to land, it’s also occurring in the oceans.  Coral is a very delicate type of marine animal with a soft tissue that grows around a hard inner skeleton.  Over hundreds of years, this growth accumulates into the reefs so admired by tourists.  However it only takes a very slight touch to damage years of coral growth.  Unskilled divers and snorkelers alike will touch and kill portions of the reef because of their close proximity to the delicate coral.  Skillful divers can avoid contacting and damaging coral reefs through the use of good buoyancy control.   However with the increase of participants in such activities (due in large part to increasingly less stringent certification standards), also comes an increase in damage.   To that one must also consider the impact of the boats carrying these people to the reefs.  Anchors and anchor chains are claiming huge pieces of coral growth when used carelessly.  With an increase in number of tourists, comes an increase in the need for accommodations and services.  Costal habitat destruction has grown out of control in many of the world’s top reef destinations.  The mangrove forest, a vital part of the life cycle of reef animals is being removed to make room for hotels to accommodate reef-seeking tourists.  Not unlike other areas of the world, the use of fresh water and the production of wastewater in these destinations have also been on the rise.

A coral reef is naturally a very nutrient poor environment.  Subsequently corals have adapted exotic means of nutrition in order to survive in such nutrient poor water.  They carry symbiotic algae called zooxanthellae which lives within the coral’s tissues and provides it with its beautiful colors.  However with the massive influx of nitrates and phosphates (two major bi-products of treating waste water), the ocean’s water chemistry is changing.  Corals are suffering from bleaching and are being choked off by invasive algae species competing for the same space on the reef.  This invasive algae, unlike corals, can utilize this chemical waste directly, thus allowing it overtake the coral reef in a race for survival.  In addition to these physical and biological threats, there are social threats to the reef environment as well.  With an increase of tourists comes an increase in the demand for shells, dried corals for souvenirs, as well as local cuisine such as fish and lobster.  When all of these factors are taken into consideration we get a clear picture on how badly coral reefs are being damaged by “nature friendly” tourists.

The heart of the problem is that the term “ecotourism” has lost its original meaning.  This misnomer gives tourists a false sense of environmental transparency.  If a tourist thinks its “ecotourism” it must be safe for the environment, right?   Well, not really.

Over time people have taken the term ecotourism as a synonym for sustainable tourism.  In reality sustainable tourism is much more than just caring about the environments we visit.  Sustainable tourism must also take into consideration all factors that affect a specific ecosystem.  This is a level of awareness that few nations have achieved in there promotion of so-called ecotourism.   However with a better awareness of the problems associated with ecotourism and an increase in efforts being made by the hosting nations, it’s possible to return ecotourism to its environmentally friendly origins.  As of now, there are few worldwide bodies governing the promotion of ecotourism.  However recently the idea of an ecotourism oversight organization has become a popular concept with concerned activists.  Others suggest alternatives to a governing body, such as the promotion of eco-aware propaganda, educating people on the issues associated with ecotourism.  Either way, it’s clear that people are becoming aware of the need to control the growth of ecotourism.

Opponents to these changes will argue that enforcing standards to what can be sold as “ecotourism” will decrease travel volume, thus decrease the money that is coming into these nations.  This argument has a certain amount of merit, because it’s inevitable that fewer travelers will choose a truly sustainable tour, with its associated compromises in price, comfort and convenience.  However, if environmental stewardship is the true goal, fewer travelers are exactly what the doctor ordered.  With a decrease in the number of travelers, there will be inevitable rise in the cost of ecotourism.  In turn, this rise in cost will cause ecotourism to be somewhat self-limiting and ultimately that is a good thing.   What is agreed upon however is that ecotourism is not currently being practiced in a sustainable way and changes must be made, or all of our gains in awareness will be for nothing.  We will simple become acutely aware of the damage we are causing.

While ecotourism is considered by many people as being ecologically harmless, its popularity has turned it into one of the planet’s most devastating problems.   While these ecotourists travel to enjoy and preserve our planet’s most beautiful ecosystems, the sheer volume of people and the poor management of this booming industry have caused ecotourism to become a threat.  With a stronger set of ecologically sustainable standards as well as in increase in the education and awareness of tourists, it will be possible to turn ecotourism back into an environmentally friendly way to see the world.   I for one will continue to participate in ecotourism, but I also fully intend on adapting to the real world requirements, to keep my travel environmentally sustainable.  Even if that means higher prices and less air conditioning!
www.scottshenton.com
info@scottshenton.com
Facebook

Advertisement

Actions

Information

3 responses

6 04 2010
Brian s

Scott. Good article. I’m of the camp that says we need to put more restrictions on ecotourism and have a globally acceptable standard for ecotourism. It’s sort of like organic. Pretty much everone was using that term for products just to get customers, but reality was half had no organic ( in the strictest terms) material in it. Same for ecotourism, much that is billed as such really ismissing the mark. It’s a word used to entice the I’ll informed consers to part with their cash. Real ecotourism needs to be sustainable and strive for zero impact on the ecosystem that is being visited. There is a good show that is put on every year in dc that focuses on real ecotourism. You should check it out. Also, you mentioned coral and the stress tourism has on it. I whole heartedly agree. Far too many yahoos are being given certifications to dive or permits to take tourists to reefs for snorkeling. Many have no clue the harm that they are doing or could be done. Conservation ethics and sustainable practices need to be included in every open water cert class and for every dive/snorkel operator. Until this is done reefs are going to continue to be under pressure of stress and destruction and may not even make it another 10 years in much of the world. If the consumers/ tourist/tour operators don’t want to hear this type of stuff, to bad, they shouldn’t be allowed to dive. Ok, this is my soap box issue, enough from me.

5 02 2012
Mike D

Scott,

I’d encourage you to become a part of the Leave No Trace organization (www.lnt.org). Their mission is to minimize all impacts to the environment. I’m an LNT Trainer and have contacted them about developing a similar program for the underwater environment, but haven’t had much time to work on it. They have guidelines to follow for everything from backcountry camping to hunting under the realization that people will continue to do these activities, but they should be educated on how to minimize their impact. My thought is that PADI should work with them.

6 02 2012
Scott Shenton

I agree. You make an interesting point about hunters. Although I don’t hunt, I think it’s an oversight on part of some of the conservation organizations to look past the sportsman community for support in these types of efforts. They are an important ally in the battle against habitat and wildlife destruction, and the majority I meet, are just as concerned with preserving wildlife as I am.

I’ll look into http://www.int.org for sure!

Thanks again,
Scott Shenton

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.